I disagree to some extent. I think the problem is not with the MCAT but with the FSc system. There should be one unanimous body that should check all the papers. I don't mean to point fingers but there are so many students who have 950+ marks in FSc but don't even know the most basic things about their subjects.
I am quite fond of the MCAT system. You have biology which is the cramming part, Physics which is the analytical part and Chemistry which is a combination of both. There is also no bias in the checking whereas in your FSc papers there are a hundred and one factors that determine your marks. It could be the checker's mood and what not. It is, imo, a muddled system.
You are so right!!!
Fsc sucks honestly! I got straight A's in O levels but Fsc was horrible...I mean I knew the syllabus and performed my best but my fsc result was bad....I didnt even reach 900...a little less than 900
I think that Fsc needs to be revised...I believe that the papers are not checked by competent people....
and i love MCAT